Watch how to make it at the 12-minute mark on Video
Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines
Phase Contrast Microscopy, Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Reveal the Ingredients in the CoV-19 Vaccines!
Germs Are Born In Us and From Us as an Outfection and NOT an Infection of the Body Cells. In other words germs are symptoms of cellular and genetic disorganization and NOT the specific cause of the cellular and genetic disorganization! The GERM is NOTHING and the TERRAIN is EVERYTHING . Germs can only contribute to a state of toxic imbalance but NEVER cause ANY specific sickness or disease! – Dr. Robert O. Young
Currently there are four major pharmaceutical companies who manufacture a SARS-CoV-2 now called SARS-CoV-19 vaccine. These manufactures and their vaccine are Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA Vaccine, the Moderna-Lonza mRNA-1273 Vaccine, the Serum Institute Oxford Astrazeneca Vaccine and the Janssen COVID -19 Vaccine, manufactured by Janssen Biotech Inc., a Janssen Pharmaceutical Company of Johnson & Johnson, a recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The intended purpose of these vaccines are to provide immunity from the so-called infectious novel coronavirus or SARS-CoV – 2 virus now called the SARS-CoV – 19. These four pharmaceutical companies have not provided complete FDA disclosure on their vaccine box, insert fact sheet or label for many of the major and/or minor ingredients contained within these so-called vaccines. The purpose of this research article is to identify those specific major and minor ingredients contained in the Pfizer Vaccine, the Moderna Vaccine, the Astrazeneca Vaccine and the Janssen Vaccine using various scientific anatomical, physiological and functional testing for each SARS-COV-2-19 vaccine. As a human right, governed under World Law by the Nuremberg Code of 1947, the vaccine specific ingredient information is critical, required and necessary to know so that any human from any country in the World can make an informed decision whether or not to consent to the SAR-CoV-2-19 inoculation. We have conducted the scientific testing on each vaccine and have identified several ingredients or adjuvants that have not been disclosed which are contained in these four SARS-CoV – 2 -19 vaccines. Currently, these vaccines are being administered to millions of humans around the World under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) issued by each country without full disclosure of all ingredients and in some cases mandated by governments or employers in violation of individual human rights under the Nuremberg Code of 1947.
Methodology and Techniques
Four “vaccines” were analyzed which are the Pfizer-BioNtech, Moderna-Lonza mRNA-1273 Vaccine, Vaxzevria by Astrazeneca, Janssen by Johnson & Johnson, using different instrumentation and protocols of preparation according to new nano particulate technological approaches. The different instrumentation includes Optical Microscopy, Bright-Field Microscopy, pHase Contrast Microscopy, Dark-Field Microscopy, UV absorbance and Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy, Energy Dispersive Spectroscopty, X-ray Diffractometer, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance instruments were used to verify the “vaccines” morphologies and contents. For the high-technology measurements and the care of the investigation, all the controls were activated and reference measurements adopted in order to obtain validated results.
Live Blood Phase Contrast and Dark-Field Microscopy
Images of the aqueous fractions of the vaccines were subsequently obtained to visually assess the possible presence of carbon particulates or graphene.
The observations under optical microscopy revealed and abundance of transparent 2D laminar objects that show great similarity with images from literature (Xu et al, 2019), and with images obtained from rGO standard (SIGMA)(Figures 1, 2 and 3).
Images of big transparent sheets of variable size and shapes were obtained, showing corrugated and flat, irregular. Smaller sheets of polygonal shapes, also similar to flakes described in literature (Xu et al, 2019) can be revealed with pHase Contrast and Dark-Field microscopy (Figure 3).
All these laminar objects were widespread in the aqueous fraction of the blood (Figure 1) or vaccine sample (Figures 2 and 3) and no component described by the registered patent can be associated with these sheets.
In Figure 1 You Can See What A Cluster Bomb of Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Looks Like in the Live Unstained Human Blood after a CoV-19 Inoculation Causing Pathological Blood Coagulation!
Figure 1 is a Micrograph of a Carbon Cluster of Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Viewed in the Live Unstained Human Blood with pHase Contrast Microscopy at 1500x. Note that the Red Blood Cells are Clotting in and Around the rGO Crystal in a Condition Known as Rouleau! A French Word Which Means to Chain.
What Are the Non-Disclosed Ingredients Contained in CoV – 19 So-Called Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen Vaccines?
To answer this question an aqueous fraction of the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen vaccines were taken from each vile and then viewed separately under pHase Contrast Microscopy at 100x, 600x up to1500x magnification showing anatomical evidence of reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) particulates which were compared to micrographs of rGO from Choucair et al, 2009 for identification and verification.
Steps of Analysis of Vaccine Aqueous Fractions
Refrigerated samples were processed under sterile conditions, using laminar flow chamber and sterilized lab ware.
Steps for analyses were:
1. Dilution in 0.9% sterile physiological saline (0.45 ml + 1.2 ml)
2. Polarity fractionation: 1.2 ml hexane + 120 ul of RD1 sample
3. Extraction of hydrophilic aqueous phase
4. UV absorbance and fluorescence spectroscopy scanning
5. Extraction and quantification of RNA in the sample
6. Electron and optical microscopy of aqueous phase
The Pfizer “Vaccine” Non-disclosed Ingredients
The micrographs in Figures 2 and 3 were obtained using 100X, 600X and 1500X pHase Contrast, Dark Field and Bright Field Optical Microscopy.
On the left of each micrograph you will view micrographs obtained from the Pfizer vaccine aqueous fraction containing rGO.
On the right of each micrograph you will view a match from known sources containing rGO for anatomical validation.
The observations under a pHase Contrast, Dark-Field and Bright-Field microscopy of the vaccine product by Pfizer revealed some entities that can be graphene strips as seen below in Figure 3.
Figure 2 shows an aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample (left) and from reduced graphene oxide (rGO) standard (right) (Sigma-777684). Optical microscopy, 100X
Figure 3 – Aqueous fraction images containing reduced graphene oxide from Pfizer vaccine sample (left) and sonicated reduced graphene oxide (rGO) standard (right) (Sigma-777684). Optical pHase contrast microscopy, 600X
Figure 4 shows the liposome Capsid containing rGO that Pfizer uses for its product to vehiculate the graphene oxide by attaching the Liposome capsid to specific mRNA molecules for driving the Liposome contents of fGO to specific organs, glands and tissues, namely the ovaries and testes, bone marrow, heart and brain. The image was obtained by a SEM-Cryo preparation.
Using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) we observed an intricate matrix or mesh of folded translucent flexible rGO sheets with a mixture of darker multilayer agglomerations and lighter colored of unfolded monolayers as seen in Figure 5. 
Figure 5 shows a cluster of graphene nanoparticles in a Pfizer vaccine. They appear to be aggregated.
The darker linear areas in Figure 5 appear to be local overlap of sheets and local arrangement of individual sheets in parallel to the electron beam.
After the mesh, a high density of unidentified rounded and elliptical clear shapes appears, possibly corresponding to holes generated by mechanical forcing of the rGO mesh during treatment as seen in Figure 6.
Figure 6 shows a TEM microscopy observation where particles of reduced graphene oxide in a Pfizer” vaccine” are present. The X-ray diffractometry reveals their nature of crystalline Carbon-based nanoparticles of rGO
Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Reveals rGO in Pfizer Vaccine
The Pfizer vaccine liquid fraction was then analyzed for chemical and elemental content using Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) as seen in Figure 6. The EDS spectrum showed the presence of Carbon, Oxygen verifying the rGO elements and Sodium and Chloride since the sample shown in Figures 2, 3, 5, and 6 were diluted in a saline solution.
Figure 7 shows an EDS spectrum of a Pfizer “vaccine” under an ESEM microscopy coupled with an EDS x-ray microprobe (X axis =KeV, Y axis = Counts) identifying Carbon, Oxygen, Sodium and Chloride
The Quantification of mRNA in the Pfizer Vaccine
The quantification of RNA in the Pfizer sample was carried out with conventional protocols (Fisher).
According to NanoDropTM 2000 spectrophotometer calibration check specific software (Thermofisher), the UV absorption spectrum of total aqueous fraction was correlated to 747 ng/ul of unknown absorbing substances.
However, after RNA extraction with commercial kit (Thermofisher), quantification with RNA specific Qbit fluorescence probe (Thermofisher) showed that only 6t ug/ul could be related to the presence of RNA. The spectrum was compatible with the peak of rGO at 270nm.
According to microscopic images presented here, most of this absorbance might be due to graphene-like sheets, abundant in the fluids suspension in the sample.
The conclusions are further supported by high fluorescence from the sample with maximum at 340 nm, in accordance with peak values for rGO. It must be reminded that RNA does not show spontaneous fluorescence under UV exposure.
Figure 8 – UV spectrum of aqueous fraction of Pfizer vaccine sample.
Ultra Violet Fluorescence Testing of the Pfizer Aqueous Fraction for Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO)
Ultra Violet absorption and fluorescence spectra were obtained with Cytation 5 Cell Imaging Multi-Mode Reader Spectrophotometer (BioteK). UV absorbance spectrum confirmed a maximum peak at 270nm, compatible with presence of rGO particulate.
UV fluorescence maximum at 340 nm also suggests presence of significant amounts of rGO in the sample (Bano et al, 2019).
Figure 9 – UV absorption and fluorescence spectra were obtained with Cytation 5 Cell Imaging Multi-Mode Reader Spectrophotometer (BioteK). UV absorbance spectrum confirmed a maximum peak at 270 nm, compatible with presence of rGO. UV fluorescence maximum at 340 nm also suggests presence of significant amounts of rGO in the sample (Bano et al, 2019).
Figure 10 – The spectroscopy UV analysis showed an adsorption due to the presence of reduced graphene oxide, which is confirmed by observation under ultraviolet visible microscopy.
Figures 11 and 12 below shows a micrograph of different micro and nano particulates which have been identified in the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen, so-called “vaccines” and analyzed under an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System that reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates viewed.
Figure 11 shows sharp micron debris of 20 um in length identified in the Pfizer so-called “vaccine” containing Carbon, Oxygen Chromium, Sulphur, Aluminum, Chloride, Nitrogen.
Figure 12 shows a 20 micron in length particulate identified in the so-called Pfizer “vaccine”. It is composed of carbon, oxygen chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen.
Figures 13 and 14 below shows a micrograph of different micro and nano particulates which have been identified in the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen, so-called “vaccines” and analyzed under an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System that reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates.
Are There Parasites in the Pfizer “Vaccines”?
A 50 micron elongated body, as seen in Figure 13 is a sharp mysterious presence in the Pfizer vaccine. It appears and is identified anatomically as a Trypanosoma cruzi parasite of which several variants are lethal and is one of many causes of acquired immune deficiency syndrome or AIDS.[Atlas of Human Parasitology, 4th Edition, Lawrence Ash and Thomas Orithel, pages 174 to 178]
Figure 13 shows a Trypanosoma Parasite approximately 20 microns in length found in the so-called Pfizer “vaccine”. It is composed of carbon, oxygen chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen.
A Live Blood pHase Contrast Microscopy Micrograph of Trypanosoma cruzi Parasite
Figure 14 identifies a composition of nano particulates including carbon, oxygen chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen also found in the CoV-19 “vaccines.”
Figure 13 Identifies a Composite of Nano particulates
Figures 15 and 16 below show a micrograph of different micro and nano particulates which have been identified and analyzed under an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System that reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates.
The white 2-micron-long particulate is composed of bismuth, carbon, oxygen, aluminum, sodium, copper and nitrogen.
Figure 15 shows nano and micron particulates identified in the Pfizer “vaccine”. The white 2 micron long particulate is composed of bismuth, carbon, oxygen, aluminum, sodium, copper and nitrogen.
Figure 16 shows that the white 2 micron particulate found in the so-called Pfizer ‘vaccine’ is composed of bismuth, carbon, oxygen, aluminum, sodium, copper and nitrogen.
Figures 17 and 18 show the identification of organic carbon, oxygen and nitrogen particulates with an aggregate of embedded nanoparticles including bismuth, titanium, vanadium, iron, copper, silicon and aluminum which were all found in the so-called Pfizer “vaccine.”
Figure 17 – shows an organic (Carbon-Oxygen-Nitrogen) aggregate with embedded nanoparticles of bismuth, titanium. vanadium. iron, copper, silicon, aluminum embedded in Pfizer “vaccine!”
Figure 18 – shows an organic (Carbon-Oxygen-Nitrogen) aggregate with embedded nanoparticles of bismuth, titanium. vanadium. iron, copper, silicon, aluminum embedded in Pfizer “vaccine!”
The Astrazeneca “Vaccine” Non-disclosed Ingredients
Figures 19 and 20 show an engineered aggregate of iron, chromium and nickel also known as stainless steel of micro and nano particles embedded and identified in the Astrazeneca “vaccine” viewed under Transmission Electron Microscopy and quantified with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System that reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates.
Figure 19 – Engineered aggregate of iron, chromium and nickel also know as stainless steel.
Figure 20 shows the quantified namo particulates in the Astrazeneca “vaccine” with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System that reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates.
Using the XRF (X-ray fluorescence) instrument was used to evaluate the adjuvants in the Astrazeneca “vaccine”, which identified the following molecules of histidine, sucrose, Poly-ethylene glycol (PEG) or anti-freeze and ethylene alcohol. The results of this test can be seen in Figure 20.
The injection of PEG and Ethylene alcohol are both known as carcinogenic and genocytoxic. PEG was the only adjuvant declared on the data sheet listing the ingredients of the Astrazeneca “vaccine”.
Figure 21 Identifies the Spectrum of AstraZeneca Vaccine Adjuvants. Different colors are used for the four molecules identified by means of reference spectra. Relative concentration is calculated on integrals of reference signals for molecules in a quantitative spectrum acquired with a duty cycle of 5 seconds with the longest calculated T1 was 5sec.
The Janssen “Vaccine” Non-Disclosed Ingredients
Figures 22 and 23 shows an organic-inorganic aggregate identified in the Janssen “vaccine”. The particles are composed of stainless steel and are glued together with a “Carbon-based glue” of reduced graphene oxide. This aggregate is highly magnetic and can trigger pathological blood coagulation and “The Corona Effect” or “The Spike Protein Effect” creation from the degeneration of the cell membrane due to interactions with other dipoles. You can view these biological reactions or cellular transformations in the live blood under pHase Contrast and Dark Field Microscopy in Figures 24, 25 and 26.
Figure 22 A Stainless Steel Aggregation of Carbon , Oxygen, Iron and Nickel Held Together With Graphene Oxide
The Corona Effect and Spike Protein Effect
The Endogenously Created “Corona Effect” and “Spike Protein” ARE Caused by Chemical and Radiation Poisoning from Reduced Graphene Oxide and Microwave Radiation!
Figure 24 “The Corona Effect” and the Endogenous Creation of Exosomes Due to Chemical and Radiation Poisoning of the Vascular and the Interstitial fluids of the Interstitium
Figure 25 Shows “The Corona Effect” and the the Endogenous Birth of S1 Protein Spikes Caused by Radiation and Chemical Poisoning or What I Call The “Protein Spiking Effect”
Figure 26 This Micrograph Shows the Endogenous Creation of the “Spike Protein” as an Outfection and NOT and Infection!
Figures 24 and 25 above show ‘The CORONA EFFECT’ on the red blood cells with Figure 26 showing ‘The SPIKED PROTEIN EFFECT’ both caused by decompensated acidosis of the interstitial and then vascular fluids from an acidic lifestyle and specifically, exposure to toxic pulsating electro-magnetic fields at 2.4gHz or higher, chemical poisoning from the food and water ingested, toxic acidic air pollution, chem-trails and to top-it-all-off a nana particulate chemical laden CoV – 19 inoculation! Please check your feelings and false beliefs at the door before YOU prematurely cause YOURSELF harm!
The Moderna “Vaccine” Non-Disclosed Ingredients
Figure 26 and 27 identified a mixed entity of organic and inorganic matter contained in the Moderna “vaccine.”
Transmission Electron Microscopy and quantified with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System revealed the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates.
The so-called Moderna “vaccine’ is a carbon-based Reduced Graphene Oxide substrate where some nanoparticles are embedded. The nanoparticles are composed of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, aluminum, copper, iron and chlorine.
Figure 26 Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals a Graphene Oxide Composite of Embedded Organic and Non-Organic Matter
Figure 27 Reveals Embedded Cytotoxic Nano Particulates
Figures 27 and 28 shows an analysis which was also performed under Transmission Electron Microscopy and quantified with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System and revealed the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates. Many foreign bodies were identified with a spherical morphology with some bubble-shaped cavities.
Figure 29 shows they are composed of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, lead, cadmium, and selenium. This highly toxic nano particulate composition are quantum dots of cadmium selenide which are cytotoxic and genotoxic.
Figure 27 Reveals the Nano Dots in the Graphene Oxide Found in the Moderna “Vaccine”
Figure 28 Reveals the Nano Dots in the Graphene Oxide Found in the Moderna “Vaccine”
Figure 29 Reveals the Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Composite of Nano Particulates in Graphene Oxide Found in the Moderna “Vaccine”
Figures 30 and 31 further analysis of the so-called Moderna “vaccine” showed a 100-micron symplast of reduced graphene oxide nano particulate composite. The rGO is composed of carbon and oxygen with contamination of nano particulates of nitrogen, silicon, phosphorus and chlorine Chlorine.
Figure 30 Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals a Large 100 micron Symplast Composite of Reduces Graphene Oxide
Figure 31 Reveals the Nano Particulate Complex Contained in the Moderna “Vaccine”
Figures 32 and 33 show carbon-based reduced graphene oxdie entities in the Moderna “vaccine” mixed with aggregates filled with Aluminium silicate nanoparticulates.
Figure 32 Reveals a Complex of Graphene Oxide and Aluminium Silicate Using Transmission Electron Microscopy
Figure 33 Reveals the Nano Elements of Graphene Oxide and Aluminum Silicate Contained in the Moderna “Vaccine”
The SARS-CoVid-2-19 pandemic induced the pharmaceutical industries to develop new drugs that they called vaccines.
The mechanism of action of these new drugs as declared by the pharmaceutical industry coupled with what is reported in the vaccine products’ data sheet is NOT clear for current medical savants to understand that those new drugs produced by Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA Vaccine, the Moderna-Lonza mRNA-1273 Vaccine, the Serum Institute Oxford Astrazeneca Vaccine and the Janssen COVID -19 Vaccine, manufactured by Janssen Biotech Inc., a Janssen Pharmaceutical Company of Johnson & Johnson are NOT vaccines but nanotechnological drugs working as a genetic therapy.
The name “vaccine” is likely to be an escamotage (trickery) used for bureaucratic and technocratic reasons in order to receive an urgent approval, ignoring all the normal rules necessary for new drugs, especially for those involving novel nanotechnological mechanisms which have never been developed nor experienced by humans any where, at any time in the history of World.
All these so-called “vaccines” are patented and therefore their actual content is kept secret even to the buyers, who, of course, are using taxpayers’ money. So, consumers (taxpayers) have no information about what they are receiving in their bodies by inoculation. Humanity is kept in the dark as far as the nano particulate technological processes involved are concerning, on the negative effects on the cells of the body, but mostly on the possible magneticotoxic, cytotoxic and genotoxic nano-bio-interaction effect on the blood and body cells.
This current research study via direct analysis on the aforementioned so-called “vaccines” by means of nano particulate technological instrumentation reveals disturbing and life-altering information concerning the truth about the actual toxic acidic contents of the so-called vaccines.
The Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen drugs are NOT “vaccines” but complexed Graphene Oxide nano particulate aggregates of varying nano elements attached to genetically modified nucleic acids of mRNA from animal or vero cells and aborted human fetal cells as viewed and described above. Once again the ingredients in these so-called vaccines are highly magneticotoxic, cytotoxic and genotoxic to plant, insect, bird, animal and human cell membranes and their genetics which already has lead to serious injuries (estimated at over 500 million) and/or eventual death (estimated at over 35 million). through 
The so-called “experts” or “medical savants” are telling YOU that CoV -2 – 19 vaccines are the ONLY way to stop the spread of CoV-19… even when there is NO EVIDENCE of its existence and NO EVIDENCE of it spreading as determined by the scientific method of Koch or Rivers postulates!
That they’re safe — despite the documented evidence is to the contrary…
That they’re effective — even though millions of “double-jabbed” people are getting sick, theoretically exposing themselves to a NON-EXISTENT VIRUS called CoV – 19, and dying… NOT from some phantom viral infection but from the FEAR or false evidence appearing real and the toxic acid contents of reduced graphene oxide delivered via the genetically modified mRNA to specific targets of the human body leading to pathological blood coagulation, oxygen deprivation, hypercapnia, hypoxia and then death by suffocation.
That YOU MUST get at LEAST two shots PLUS “boosters” to live “normal lives”…
And soon, they’ll be telling YOU that YOU have no choice but to comply with ALL their MANdates even when the CDC and other Governments, Universities and Medical Institutes have admitted in writing that they have NO “GOLD STANDARD” isolation of the CoV – 2 now called CoV – 19 virus!
There is NO CORONA VIRUS and NEVER HAS BEEN!
DON’T LET ANYONE TAKE AWAY YOUR HEALTH FREEDOM!
It is YOUR Body, YOUR Life and YOUR Choice!
Knowledge is power. And it’s the key to understanding why the experimental CoV -19 vaccines are so dangerous — despite the corporate media’s official narrative that suppresses and censors anyone who dares to speak out.
You are in control of your own health. Don’t fall victim to global governments and bureaucrats that are pushing everyone to get vaccinated. Billionaire “philanthropist” Bill Gates and billionaire Big Tech activists think they know what’s best for you and your family.
You must be free to decide what’s right for you. Do NOT let governments and employers force you into getting “vaxxed” “for your own good”.
And never let the cancel culture make you too afraid to stand up for your rights!
In the words of the great French doctor and scientist, Antione BeChamp, “there is nothing so false that does NOT contain a element of truth and so it is with the germ theory.” In this case the viral, vaccine and immunity theory!
To learn more about viruses, vaccines and the viral theory please read and study, A Second Though About Viruses, Vaccines and the HIV AIDS Hypothesis. You can order this book at:
Read and Learn More About Viruses, Vaccines and the Viral Theory in the Following Scientific Articles!
Robert O Young MSc, DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner
1. The Epidemic Curves of the Most Vaccinated Countries https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/world-health-organization-who-publishes-epidemic-curves-of-the-most-vaccinated-countries
2. Sweden Is Following the Biological Science NOT the Political Science https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/sweden-is-following-the-biological-science-not-the-political-science
3. What is Happening in India https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/what-happened-in-india
4. Surviving the Plague of Corruption https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/surviving-the-plague-of-corruption
5. Dismantling the Viral Theory https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/dismantling-the-viral-theory
6. Corona on Trial – https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/corona-on-trial-explosive-and-exclusive
7. The Havana Cuba Syndrome Caused by Directed Pulsating EMF Microwaves https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-havana-syndrome-pulsating-microwaves
8. CDC NOW Admits NO ‘Gold Standard’ for the Isolation for ANY Virus! – https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/cdc-now-admits-no-gold-standard-for-the-isolation-for-any-virus?postId=60c4dbc74f7fc9002ba2507e
9. Freedom of Information Responses on CoV – 2 Now Called CoV – 19 – https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/freedom-of-information-responses-on-cov-2
10. Why Viruses Do Not Exist! – https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/why-viruses-do-not-exist
11. Report 255 | Dr. Robert Young: All Disease is Outfection Not Infection–Vaccine Nano is Bioweapon! https://www.bitchute.com/video/rdQhuY455VmK
12. Report 255 | Dr. Robert Young: All Disease is Outfection, not Infection | The Vaccine’s Lipid Nanoparticles with Graphene Plus Radiation is the Bioweapon–No COVID Virus Exists!
13. Report 255 | Dr. Robert Young: All Disease is Outfection Not Infection–Vaccine Nano is Bioweapon!
14. Forget Everything Else! Look at THE VAER’s NUMBERS on Injuries and Deaths! https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/forget-everything-else-you-ve-heard-just-look-at-the-numbers
15. Dr. Robert O. Young ITNJ Testimony
Sign up for Dr. Young’s FREE Newsletter NOW at: wwwdrrobertyoung.com
 Ou, L., Song, B., Liang, H. et al. Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms. Part Fibre Toxicol13, 57 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y
 Young RO (2016) Pathological Blood Coagulation and the Mycotoxic Oxidative Stress Test (MOST). Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(6): 00048. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2016.02.00048
 Xu et al, (2019) Identification of graphene oxide and its structural features in solvents by optical microscopy, RSC Adv., 9, 18559-18564
1-Extracction RNA Kit https://www.fishersci.es/shop/products/ambion-purelink-rna-mini-kit7/10307963
3- QUBIT2.0: https://www.thermofisher.com/es/es/home/references/newsletters-andjournals/bioprobes-journal-of-cell-biology-applications/bioprobes-issues-2011/bioprobes-64-april2011/the-qubit-2-0-fluorometer-april-2011.html
 Kim et al, Seeing graphene-based sheets, Materials Today,Volume 13, Issue 3,2010,Pages 28- 38,ISSN 1369-7021,https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70031-6
 Bano, I. et al , 2019. Exploring the fluorescence properties of reduced graphene oxide with tunable device performance,Diamond and Related Materials,Volume 94,59-64,ISSN 0925- 9635,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2019.02.021.
 Biroju, Ravi & Narayanan, Tharangattu & Vineesh, Thazhe Veettil. (2018). New advances in 2D electrochemistry—Catalysis and Sensing. 10.1201/9781315152042-7.
 Choucair, M., Thordarson, P. & Stride, J. Gram-scale production of graphene based on solvothermal synthesis and sonication. Nature Nanotech 4, 30–33 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.365
 Atlas of Human Parasitology, 4th Edition, Lawrence Ash and Thomas Orithel, pages 174 to 178
 Mano, S.S.; Kanehira, K.; Sonezaki, S.; Taniguchi, A. Effect of Polyethylene Glycol Modification of TiO2 Nanoparticles on Cytotoxicity and Gene Expressions in Human Cell Lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci.2012, 13, 3703-3717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13033703
 Srivastava AK, Dwivedi N, Dhand C, et al. Potential of graphene-based materials to combat COVID-19: properties, perspectives, and prospects. Mater Today Chem. 2020;18:100385. doi:10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100385
 Young, RO, “The Effects of ElectroMagnetic Frequencies (EMF) on the Blood and Biological Terrain.” https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-effects-electromagnet-frequencies-on-the-blood-and-biological-terrain
 Gatti AM, Manti A, Valentini L, Montanari S, Gobbi P, et al. (2016) Nano biointeraction of particulate matter in the blood circulation. Frontiers 30: 3.
 Nikazar, S., Sivasankarapillai, V.S., Rahdar, A. et al. Revisiting the cytotoxicity of quantum dots: an in-depth overview. Biophys Rev 12, 703–718 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-020-00653-0
 Ritesh Banerjee, Priya Goswami, Manoswini Chakrabarti, Debolina Chakraborty, Amitava Mukherjee, Anita Mukherjee, Cadmium selenide (CdSe) quantum dots cause genotoxicity and oxidative stress in Allium cepa plants, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, Volume 865, 2021, 503338,ISSN 1383-5718, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503338.
 Wanjun Cao, Lin He, Weidong Cao, Xiaobing Huang, Kun Jia, Jingying Dai, Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant, Acta Biomaterialia, Volume 112, 2020, Pages 14-28, ISSN 1742-7061, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.009. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1742706120303305)
 Concise Encyclopedia of Composite Materials, ed. Anthony Kelly, MIT Press, 1989, ISBN0-262-11145-4
 L. Harivardhan Reddy, José L. Arias, Julien Nicolas, and Patrick Couvreur, “Magnetic Nanoparticles: Design and Characterization, Toxicity and Biocompatibility, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications.” Chemical Reviews 2012 112 (11), 5818-5878 DOI: 10.1021/cr300068p
 US Dpt of health and human services (1996) Report Update: Vaccine Side Effects, Adverse Reactions, Contraindications, and Precautions. CDC 45(RR-12): 1-35.
 Ottaviani G, Lavezzi AM, Matturri L (2006) Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) shortly after hexavalent vaccination: pathology in suspected SIDS? Virchows Arch 448(1): 100-104.
 Taylor B, Miller E, Farrington CP, Petropoulos MC, Favot-Mayaud I, et al. (1999) Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no epidemiological evidence for a causal association. Lancet 353(9169): 2026-2029.
 Demicheli V, Rivetti A, Debalini MG, Di Pietrantonj C (2012) Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15(2): CD004407. New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination 13/13 Copyright: ©2016 Gatti et al. Citation: Gatti AM, Montanari S (2016) New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 4(1): 00072. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2017.04.00072
 Carola Bardage, Ingemar Persson, Åke Örtqvist, Ulf Bergman, Jonas F Ludvigsson, et al. (2011) Neurological and autoimmune disorders after vaccination against pandemic influenza A (H1N1) with a monovalent adjuvanted vaccine: population based cohort study in Stockholm, Sweden. BMJ 343: d5956.
 Johann Liang R (2012) Updating the Vaccine Injury Table following the 2011 IOM Report on Adverse Effects of vaccines. HRSA, pp. 1-27.
 L Tomljenovic, CA Shaw (2011) Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe? Current Medicinal Chemistry 18(17): 2630-2637.
 Shaw CA, Petrik MS (2009) Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration. J Inorg Biochem 103(11): 1555-1562.
 Authier FJ, Sauvat S, Christov C, Chariot P, Raisbeck G, et al. (2006) AlOH3-adjuvanted vaccine-induced macrophagic myofasciitis in rats is influenced by the genetic background. Neuromuscul Disord 16(5): 347-352.
 Exley C, Esiri MM (2006) Severe cerebral congophilic angiopathy coincident with increased brain aluminium in a resident of Camelford, Cornwall, UK. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77(7): 877- 879.
 Wills MR, Savory J (1985) Water content of aluminium, dialysis dementia, and osteomalacia. Environ Health Perspect 63: 141-147.
 Brinth L, Pors K, Theibel AC, Mehlsen J (2015) Suspected side effects to the quadrivalent human papilloma vaccine. Danish Medical J 62(4): 1-12.
 Palmieri B, Poddighe D, Vadalà M, Laurino C, Carnovale C, et al. (2016) Severe somatoform and dysautonomic syndromes after HPV vaccination: case series and review of literature. Immunol Res.
 Visani G, Manti A, Valentini L, Canonico B, Loscocco F, et al. (2016) Environmental nanoparticles are significantly over-expressed in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res 50: 50-56.
 Artoni E, Sighinolfi GL, Gatti AM, Sebastiani M, Colaci M, et al. (2016) Micro and nanoparticles as possible pathogenetic co-factors in mixed cryoglobulinemia. Occupational Medicine.
 T Hansen, L Klimek, F Bittinger, I Hansen, A Gatti, et al. (2008) Mast cell reiches Aluminium granuloma Pathologe 29(4): 311-313.
 Gatti AM, Manti A, Valentini L, Montanari S, Gobbi P, et al. (2016) Nano biointeraction of particulate matter in the blood circulation. Frontiers 30: 3.
 Tenzer S, Docter D, Rosfa S, Wlodarski A, Kuharev J, et al. (2011) Nanoparticle size is a critical physicochemical determinant of the human blood plasma corona: a comprehensive quantitative proteomic analysis. ACS Nano 5(9): 7155-167.
 Radauer Preiml , Andosch A, Hawranek T, Luetz-Meindl U, Wiederstein M, et al. (2015) Nanoparticle-allergen interactions mediate human allergic responses: protein corona characterization and cellular responses. Fibre toxicology 13: 3.
 Cedervall T, Lynch I, Lindman S, Berggård T, Thulin E, et al. (2016) Understanding the nanoparticle-protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. PNAS 104 (7): 2050-2055.
 Lynch I, Cedervall T, Lundqvist M, Cabaleiro-Lago C, Linse S, et al. (2007) The nanoparticle-protein complex as a biological entity; a complex fluids and surface science challenge for the 21st century. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 134-135: 167-174.
 Gatti AM, Quaglino D, Sighinolfi GL (2009) A Morphological Approach to Monitor the Nanoparticle-Cell Interaction. International Journal of Imaging and Robotics 2: 2-21.
 Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Gilbert JL, Galante JO (1994) Migration of corrosion products from modular hip prostheses. Particle microanalysis and histopathological findings. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 76(9): 1345-1359.
 Kirkpatrick CJ, Barth S, Gerdes T, Krump-Konvalinkova V, Peters (K 2002) Pathomechanisms of impaired wound healing by metallic corrosion products. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 6(3): 183-190.
 Lee SH, Brennan FR, Jacobs JJ, Urban RM, Ragasa DR, et al. (1997) Human monocyte/macrophage response to cobalt-chromium corrosion products and titanium particles in patients with total joint replacements. J Orthop Res 15(1): 40-49.
 Shaw CA, Seneff S, Kette SD, Tomljenovic L, Oller Jr JW, et al. (2014) Aluminum-Induced Entropy in Biological Systems: Implications for Neurological Disease. Journal of Toxicology 2014: 491316.
 Shaw CA, Kette SD, Davidson RM, Seneff S (2013) Aluminum™s Role in CNS-immune System Interactions leading to Neurological Disorders. Immunome Research 9: 069.
 Seneff S, Swanson N, Chen Li (2015) Aluminum and Glyphosate Can Synergistically Induce Pineal Gland Pathology: Connection to Gut Dysbiosis and Neurological Disease. Agricultural Sciences 6(1): 42- 70.
 Pegaz B, Debefve E, Ballini JP, Konan-Kouakou YN, van den Bergh HJ (2006) Effect of nanoparticle size on the extravasations and the photothrombic activity of meso(p-tetracarboxyphenyl)porphyrin. J Photochem Photobiol B 85(3): 216-222.
 Brinth LS, Pors K, Hoppe AG, Badreldin I, Mehlsen J (2015) Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis a Relevant Diagnosis in Patients with Suspected Side Effects to Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine? International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination 1(1):1-5.
 Moos WH, Faller DV, Harpp DN, Kanara I, Pernokas J, et al. (2016) Microbiota and Neurological Disorders: A Gut Feeling. Biores Open Access 5(1): 137-145.
 Sekirov I, Russell SL, Caetano L, Antunes M, Brett (2010) Gut Microbiota in Health and Disease. Physiological Rev 90(3): 859-904.
 Umbrello G, Esposito S (2016) Microbiota and neurologic diseases: potential effects of probiotics. J Transl Med 14(1): 298.
 Kinoshita T, Abe RT, Hineno A, Tsunekawa K, Nakane S, et al. (2014) Peripheral sympathetic nerve dysfunction in adolescent Japanese girls following immunization with the human papillomavirus vaccine. Intern Med 53(19): 2185-2200.
 Zhang L, Richards A, Khalil A, Wogram E, Ma H, Young RA, Jaenisch R. SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2020 Dec 13:2020.12.12.422516. doi: 10.1101/2020.12.12.422516. PMID: 33330870; PMCID: PMC7743078.
 Young, RO, “Forget Everything Else! Look at THE VAER’s NUMBERS on Injuries and Deaths!.” https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/forget-everything-else-you-ve-heard-just-look-at-the-numbers5
 Young, RO, “CDC NOW Admits NO ‘Gold Standard’ for the Isolation for ANY Virus!” https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/cdc-now-admits-no-gold-standard-for-the-isolation-for-any-virus
 Young, RO, “The Genesis of Severe Acute Respiratory (Syndrome) or SARS & Corona Virus or COVID – 19.” https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-genesis-of-severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-or-sars-corona-virus-or-covid-19
 Young, RO, “What Causes Oxygen Deprivation of the Blood(DIC) and Then Lungs(SARS – CoV 2 & 19)?” https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/what-causes-oxygen-deprivation
 Young RO, Migalko G (2020) What Causes Oxygen Deprivation of the Blood(DIC) and Then Lungs(SARS – CoV 2 & 12)?. Integ Mol Bio Biotechnol 1: 001-007. http://sciaeon.org/articles/What-Causes-Oxygen-Deprivation-of-the-Blood-DIC-and-Then-Lungs-SARS-CoV2and12.pdf
 Young RO (2016) Who Had Their Finger on the Magic of Life – Antoine Bechamp or Louis Pasteur?. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(5): 00047. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2016.02.00047
The Vaccinated Are Worried and Scientists Don’t Have Answers
Anecdotes signal a surprising number of infections in vaccinated
Officials must formulate plans despite a dearth of hard data
Anecdotes tell us what the data can’t: Vaccinated people appear to be getting the coronavirus at a surprisingly high rate. But exactly how often isn’t clear, nor is it certain how likely they are to spread the virus to others.
Though it is evident vaccination still provides powerful protection against the virus, there’s growing concern that vaccinated people may be more vulnerable to serious illness than previously thought.
There’s a dearth of scientific studies with concrete answers, leaving public policy makers and corporate executives to formulate plans based on fragmented information. While some are renewing mask mandates or delaying office reopenings, others cite the lack of clarity to justify staying the course. It can all feel like a mess.
“We have to be humble about what we do know and what we don’t know,” said Tom Frieden, a former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the head of the nonprofit Resolve to Save Lives. “There are a few things we can say definitively. One is that this is a hard question to address.”
Absent clear public health messaging, vaccinated people are left confused about how to protect themselves. Just how vulnerable they are is a key variable not just for public health officials trying to figure out, say, when booster shots might be needed, but also to inform decisions about whether to roll back reopenings amid a new wave of the virus. On a smaller scale, the unknowns have left music lovers unsure if it’s OK to see a concert and prompted a fresh round of hang-wringing among parents pondering what school is going to look like.
In lieu of answers, what has emerged is a host of case studies providing somewhat different pictures of breakthrough infections. Variables including when the surveys were conducted, whether the delta variant was present, how much of the population was vaccinated and even what the weather was like at the time make it hard to compare results and suss out patterns. It’s difficult to know which data might ultimately carry more heft.
“It’s quite clear that we have more breakthroughs now,” said Monica Gandhi, an infectious disease expert at the University of California, San Francisco. “We all know someone who has had one. But we don’t have great clinical data.”
One of the best known outbreaks among vaccinated people occurred in the small beach town of Provincetown, Massachusetts, as thousands of vaccinated and unvaccinated alike gathered on dance floors and at house parties over the Fourth of July weekend to celebrate the holiday — and what seemed like a turning point in the pandemic. About three-fourths of the 469 infections were among vaccinated people.
Authors of a CDC case study said this might mean that they were just as likely to transmit Covid-19 as the unvaccinated. Even so, they cautioned, as more people are vaccinated, it’s natural that they would also account for a larger share of Covid-19 infections and this one study was not sufficient to draw any conclusions. The incident prompted the CDC to reverse a recommendation it had issued just a few weeks earlier and once again urge the vaccinated to mask up in certain settings.
Still, the particular details of that cluster of cases may have made that outbreak especially bad, according to Gandhi.
“The rate of mild symptomatic outbreaks in this population was higher because of a lot of indoor activity (including intimacy), rain that weekend, not much outside time and mixture of people with different vaccination status,” she said in an email.
A newly released, far larger CDC case study of infections in New York state, meanwhile, found that the number of breakthrough infections has steadily ticked up since May, accounting for almost 4% of cases by mid-July. Those researchers cautioned that factors such as easing public health restrictions and the rise of the highly contagious delta variant might impact the results.
Yet another CDC case study, in Colorado, found that the breakthrough infection rate in one county, Mesa, was significantly higher than the rest of the state, at 7% versus about 5%. The report suggested it was perhaps because the delta variant was circulating more widely there, but also noted the ages of patients in Mesa and the lower vaccination rate may have played a role.
Research out of Israel seems to back the idea that protection from severe disease wanes in the months after inoculation, and more recently, that breakthrough cases may eventually lead to an uptick in hospitalizations. The information is preliminary and severe breakthrough cases are still rare, but it bolsters the case that some people will need booster shots in coming months.
Case studies and data from some states in the U.S. have similarly shown an increase in breakthrough cases over time. But with the delta variant also on the rise, it’s difficult to tell whether waning immunity to any type of coronavirus infection is to blame, or if the vaccinations are particularly ineffective against the delta variant. It could be both, of course. Changing behavior among vaccinated people could be a factor, too, as they return to social gatherings and travel and dining indoors.
Dr. Tenpenny: I’ve actually been talking to a whistleblower right now that’s yet to be named, who’s an insider at Pfizer, who called and was crying and said that 45,000 number – “I have documentation…that number is closer to 200,000 people that have died within a week or less of getting one of the shots.”
The reason why hospitalizations are “99% unvaccinated” is incredibly simple: Hospitals are not required to report Covid-19 hospitalizations among vaccinated people
“DSHS doesn’t track the number of COVID-19 hospitalizations among vaccinated people statewide because hospitals are not required to report that information to the state. Travis County’s health authority, Dr. Desmar Walkes, told county commissioners and Austin City Council members in a Tuesday meeting that almost all new COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations in the area have been among unvaccinated people”
Dr. Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko is the Doctor who recommended that President Trump take hydroxychloroquine
-Zelenko Protocol innovator: 99% survival of high risk Covid-19 patients
-Nominated for the Presidential Medal of Freedom
-Nominated for the Nobel Prize
-Published in top peer reviewed journals with world renowned physicians
-Provided counsel to White House personnel, multiple governments, hospitals, physicians, public figures
-Board Certified Family Physician with over 20 years experience BRINGS HOPE for those who are trapped in the imminent feeling of doom.
If you have “jab remorse”, the show isn’t over, and there are ways to treat the antibody dependent enhancement that you may experience as a result of the inoculation.
Get Dr. Zelenko’s “Z-Stack” at www.VladimirZelenkoMD.com
Of all those who have been critical of our vaccination efforts related to Covid-19, vaccine expert Geert Vanden Bossche stands out as one of the loudest voices in the crowd.
Having been featured on Dr. Chris Martenson’s Peak Prosperity and Bret Weinstein’s Dark Horse podcast, Vanden Bossche has been outspoken – yet measured and reasoned – in his critiquing of mass vaccinations during the midst of the Covid pandemic. One of his main gripes with vaccination efforts is that vaccinating during the middle of a pandemic could potentially lead to a long runway of variants, some of which may evolve to be far more difficult to deal with than the original Covid virus.
And Vanden Bossche is an expert in the space with an extensive resume. He received his DVM from the University of Ghent, Belgium, and his PhD degree in Virology from the University of Hohenheim, Germany. He has worked for several vaccine companies (GSK Biologicals, Novartis Vaccines, Solvay Biologicals) to serve various roles in vaccine R&D as well as in late vaccine development.
He also joined the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Health Discovery team in Seattle (USA) as Senior Program Officer before working with the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) in Geneva as Senior Ebola Program Manager. At GAVI he tracked efforts to develop an Ebola vaccine. He also represented GAVI in fora with other partners, including WHO, to review progress on the fight against Ebola and to build plans for global pandemic preparedness.
He then joined the German Center for Infection Research in Cologne as Head of the Vaccine Development Office.
In a new blog post published yesterday, Vanden Bossche continued to raise questions about our mass vaccination program to fight Covid.
In a summary of his findings, he writes: “As of the early days of the mass vaccination campaigns, at least a few experts have been warning against the catastrophic impact such a program could have on global and individual health. Mass vaccination in the middle of a pandemic is prone to promoting selection and adaptation of immune escape variants that are featured by increasing infectiousness and resistance to spike protein (S)-directed antibodies (Abs), thereby diminishing protection in vaccinees and threatening the unvaccinated.”
“This already explains why the WHO’s mass vaccination program is not only unable to generate herd immunity (HI) but even leads to substantial erosion of the population’s immune protective capacity,” he continues. “As the ongoing universal mass vaccination program will soon promote dominant propagation of highly infectious, neutralization escape mutants (i.e., so-called ‘S Ab-resistant variants’), naturally acquired, or vaccinal neutralizing Abs, will, indeed, no longer offer any protection to immunized individuals whereas high infectious pressure will continue to suppress the innate immune defense system of the nonvaccinated.”
“This is to say that every further increase in vaccine coverage rates will further contribute to forcing the virus into resistance to neutralizing, S-specific Abs. Increased viral infectivity, combined with evasion from antiviral immunity, will inevitably result in an additional toll taken on human health and human lives.”
He then urges “immediate action”, writing: “Immediate action needs, therefore, to be taken in order to dramatically reduce viral infectivity rates and to prevent selected immune escape variants from rapidly spreading through the entire population, whether vaccinated or not. This first critical step can only be achieved by calling an immediate halt to the mass vaccination program and replacing it by widespread use of antiviral chemoprophylactics while dedicating massive public health resources to scaling early multidrug treatments of Covid-19 disease.”
You can read his full, comprehensive findings at his blog here.